🇦🇺
If I Was Prime Minister
A blueprint to abolish corruption from Australian government
🏛️ Pay Politicians Like Singapore Does
(Pay Politicians Like Singapore Does)
Performance-linked ministerial salaries tied to the bottom 20% of earners — backed by 60 years of Singapore data, three academic studies, and a Democratic Transition Annuity that permanently closes the revolving door.
← Back
🎙️
Podcast — Listen to This Policy
AI-generated audio walkthrough — great for commutes or sharing.

The Problem: Three Structural Failures of Underpaying Politicians

Australia's current model creates three compounding failures: 1. Adverse selection — talented people in law, finance and enterprise avoid public office because the financial sacrifice is prohibitive, leaving parliament to the independently wealthy or those with lower market value 2. Rate of temptation — a low legitimate income makes the marginal utility of a bribe or deferred corporate favour immensely attractive (Van Rijckeghem & Weder, 2001) 3. The revolving door — politicians monetise their regulatory access upon retirement, creating implicit corruption that never requires a single cash payment

The Singapore MR4 Framework

Singapore's 1994 White Paper Competitive Salaries for Competent & Honest Government pegs the entry-level ministerial benchmark (MR4) to the median of the top 1,000 Singapore citizen earners — then applies a permanent 40% public service discount. The result (S$1.8M recommended in the 2026 review) is competitive but not mercenary.

Component Type Trigger
Monthly Salary + 13th Month Fixed (~65%) Baseline discharge of ministerial duties
Annual Variable Component Variable Tracks broader labour market conditions
Individual Performance Bonus (up to 6 months) Variable PM-assessed portfolio performance
National Bonus (up to 6 months) Variable Tied to national KPIs — see below

The National Bonus: Mechanism Design, Not Charity

The National Bonus is split four ways: - 25% — unemployment rate - 25% — real GDP growth - 25% — real income growth of the median earner (P50) - 25% — real income growth of the bottom 20% of earners (P20)

A minister's personal financial wellbeing is hard-coded to whether the poorest Singaporeans received a pay rise this year. Elite self-interest and working-class advancement become mathematically identical.

60 Years of Evidence: Three Corruption Cases in Six Decades

All prosecuted. All publicised. - Wee Toon Boon (1975): S$800,000 in bribes including a bungalow; imprisoned - Teh Cheang Wan (1986): S$800,000 in facilitation payments; committed suicide before charges; investigation continued posthumously - S. Iswaran (2023–24): S$384,340 in luxury items from a property developer; resigned; 12-month sentence — harsher than prosecution sought

Singapore has ranked top 3 on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index for 30+ consecutive years.

The Academic Evidence: Three Independent Studies

  • Besley & McLaren (1993): Mathematically modelled three wage regimes for public officials. High wages deter corruption only when combined with credible enforcement — the salary must be high enough that losing it costs more than any bribe
  • Van Rijckeghem & Weder (2001): Cross-country data shows a statistically significant negative correlation between relative civil service pay and corruption levels
  • Gagliarducci & Nannicini (2013): Italian natural experiment — a legislated 33% mayoral wage increase attracted politicians with 0.879 more years of formal schooling; per-capita government tariffs fell by 86%

The Australian Adaptation

1. Independent performance-linked pay — Retain the Remuneration Tribunal (no self-dealing) but restructure around a fixed base (~$400K) plus a National Bonus tied to: P25 income growth, housing affordability ratio, regional economic growth, and inflation stabilisation.

2. Grandfathering clause — New rules apply only to MPs elected after the legislation passes. Incumbents voting on the bill are explicitly excluded from its benefits — forcing them to vote on structural merit alone.

3. Democratic Transition Annuity (DTA) — Upon leaving parliament, ministers receive a lifetime tax-free annuity (~$300K/year) in exchange for a legally binding, permanent ban on board seats in listed companies, lobbying firms, and government relations advisory roles. The choice is free: join the industry you regulated and forfeit the annuity forever, or take the annuity and remain permanently independent.

The Cost Calculation

Singapore's entire Cabinet costs ~A$45M per year. If performance-linked pay and the DTA reduce the regulatory capture that enables Australia's PRRT failure by even 10%, the policy pays for itself 38 times over in the first year against $17B in currently foregone resource revenue.

🔬
AI Deep Research Report
This policy has been independently researched — evidence reviewed, counterarguments tested, and the case built from first principles.
Read the Full AI Deep Research Report →
📣 Ready to do something about it?
Email, call, or post on social media — takes under 2 minutes.
Tell Your Senator →
← Home + Add New Policy RSS Feed